R: R: R: [Xen-users] Storage questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Absolutly i do!

 

You need to use gfs2 and almost 3  journals (one for each node). You can also add more journal with gfs2_jadd command.

 

Regards,

Francesco Gallo

 

Da: antoine.benkemoun@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:antoine.benkemoun@xxxxxxxxx] Per conto di Antoine Benkemoun
Inviato: mercoledì 11 febbraio 2009 17.20
A: Francesco Gallo - XiNet S.r.L.
Cc: linux clustering
Oggetto: Re: R: R: [Xen-users] Storage questions

 

Ok sounds really good. Thank you very much for your help.

You confirm that with iSCSI three nodes can access to the same files ? Is it necessary to install GFS in order to do that.

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Francesco Gallo - XiNet S.r.L. <cluster@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

I use IET (http://iscsitarget.sourceforge.net/) compiled for CentoS 5.2.

It is really simple to use and configure.

Rgds,
Francesco

-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] Per conto di Paolo Marini
Inviato: mercoledì 11 febbraio 2009 16.45
A: linux clustering
Oggetto: Re: R: [Xen-users] Storage questions

I have setup storage using openfiler as an iscsi-target. I use gigabit
interfaces, two links in channel bonding, and the iscsi storage serves
both a physical and a virtual cluster of XEN VMs.

Rgds, Paolo

> What about iscsi-target?
>
>
>
> You could transform a server in something like an ISCSI storage.
>
>
>
> I use this solution in my office with a tree nodes cluster.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Francesco Gallo
>
>
>
> Da: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Per conto di Antoine
> Benkemoun
> Inviato: mercoledì 11 febbraio 2009 15.54
> A: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Oggetto: [Xen-users] Storage questions
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I am looking to set up a Xen array of servers and I don't really know how
> to
> set up the storage subsystem.
>
> I have been looking for a little while and two options stand out for my
> setup. The problem is rather simple, I need a pool of servers to access a
> shared storage ressource.
>
> The first option is the easiest, NFS.
>
> The second option is a little more complex in appearance. I won't be able
> to
> have enough budget to buy a SAN so that is out of the question. What I
> could
> do is have a storage server with a bunch of disks. I would GNBD (or some
> other Network Block Driver) coupled with GFS. I am pretty new to these two
> concepts. I know that GNBD cannot be used alone if I want more then a
> single
> server to access the storage space.
>
> What is more interesting with performance in mind ?
>
> Thank you in advance for your input,
>
> Antoine Benkemoun
>
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster


--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

 

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux