Hi, On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 16:05 +0100, Jürgen Knödlseder wrote: > Hi Bob, > > Can you run Red Hat 5.3 on a 2.6.27 or 2.6.28 kernel to get full SSI > support from MOSIX? (that's my second constraint in addition to having > gfs working ...) > > Regards, > > Jürgen > Well if you use a different kernel, then its not 5.3... the issue is that we need to do a little more testing of the upstream GFS2. Its pretty close to being ready though. If you are getting a system ready and are doing pre-production tests, then you might well want to consider using GFS2 as it won't be too much longer now before we declare it ready. The more people who can help test, the closer we'll get towards our goal of calling it stable and production ready. The upstream GFS2 has one or two features which 5.3 doesn't have so that we need to ensure that those changes haven't caused any regressions along the way. We are of course very interested in any feedback from testing, both positive and negative in the mean time, Steve. > Le 22 janv. 09 à 15:28, Bob Peterson a écrit : > > > ----- "Jürgen Knödlseder" <jurgen.knodlseder@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > | I confirm that the problem persists with cluster 2.03.11 release ... > > | > > | > > | By the way: replacing the gfs filesystem by gfs2 makes the > > problem go > > | away. > > | Yet as one reads so often: gfs2 is not production ready, so I would > > | prefer to > > | get this working with gfs :-) > > | > > | > > | Jürgen > > > > Hi Jürgen, > > > > With Red Hat's the release of 5.3 gfs2 is not only production ready, > > it is also fully supported. > > > > Regards, > > > > Bob Peterson > > Red Hat GFS > > > > -- > > Linux-cluster mailing list > > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
