> ESX is probably tuned better for large scale vm hosting than vmware > server. You also get the option of a bunch of other bells and whistles > with esx - things like vmotion which it seems you're attempting to > duplicate. I say option, because you still have to pay for it. A > single esx box on it's own probably isn't much different than vmware > server running on top of some linux distro. I've not tried it yet but do have my license and CDROM ready to go :). I didn't see anything about having to buy options but then, I've not read a lot about it yet either. So I guess at this point, GFS is no longer a part of any solution I may have been looking for so will have to post in the proper place, the ESX forums. Thanks for all of the input. Mike -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster