Many thanks for the clear info. I've installed kmod-gfs and cman-2.0.84. I notice that kmod gfs2 is loaded when I start service cman. I see that gfs2.ko is part of kernel-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5, which is the kernel in use on the system. Is this expected behaviour? When I exec service gfs start should I expect gks.ko to be loaded? Thx Again.... Shaun -----Original Message----- From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steven Whitehouse Sent: maandag 1 december 2008 10:32 To: linux clustering Subject: Re: GFS2 on CentOS v5.2 Hi, On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 10:03 +0100, Jos Vos wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 10:59:47AM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 07:12:07PM +0200, Mikko Partio wrote: > > > > > > There has to be some drastic changes in GFS2 between 5.2 and 5.3 > > > since I still haven't seen a single post in this list stating that > > > GFS2 in 5.2 (or previous RHEL versions) is working for them. :) > > > > > > > Then you haven't been paying enough attention ;) > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx/msg04706.html > > I don't see how this answer negates Mikko's statement... > The reason that you've not seen reports from people running 5.2 and 5.1 (whether RHEL or CentOS) is that we've been discouraging people from using those versions. The 5.3 beta version of RHEL is the best one for eval purposes at the moment, also Fedora would be a good distro to test if you want something thats most uptodate, Steve. -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster Op dit e-mailbericht is een disclaimer van toepassing, welke te vinden is op http://www.espritxb.nl/disclaimer -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
