Re: GFS kernel patch?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- "Stephen Amadei" <stephenamadei@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| Am I crazy or was there a GFS kernel patch that was needed to use GFS
| with 2.6.27.x/2.03.09?
| 
| Now it looks like GFS is only available as a kernel module. Is there a
| way to patch this into the kernel?
| My kernels don't run modules.
| 
| Thanks.
| 
| Stephen

Hi Stephen,

AFAIK, gfs was always a kernel module.  You might be able to patch it in
to the kernel source tree by hand, but I've never done it.

There was a gfs patch to enable it to allocate files properly for newer
kernels, such as 2.6.27.x.  That was just to do a little kernel catchup
in gfs1.

On the other hand, GFS2 has been a part of the base kernel for a while
now, although it's still not considered production ready.  I think the
version currently pulled into Linus's tree is pretty good.  Steve
Whitehouse's "nmw" git tree in kernel.org has the latest/greatest GFS2
and should be fairly stable, although it's a moving target.

Regards,

Bob Peterson
Red Hat GFS

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux