Is "gfs2_tool counters" supported?
Doesn't work for us, and I found reference to correcting the man page
so it's no longer included.
Thanks.
djm
On Nov 6, 2008, at 1:53 PM, Jeff Sturm wrote:
I looked over the summit document you referenced below. The value
of demote_secs mentioned is an example setting, and unfortunately no
recommendations or rationale accompany this.
For some access patterns you can get better performance by actually
increasing demote_secs. For example, we have a node that we
routinely rsync a file tree onto using a GFS partition. Increasing
demote_secs from 300 to 86400 reduced the average rsync time by a
factor of about 4. The reason is that this node has little lock
contention and needs to lock each file every time we start an rsync
process. With demote_secs=300, it was doing much more work to
reacquire locks on each run. Whereas demote_secs=86400 allowed the
locks to persist up to a day, since the overall number of files in
our application is bounded such that they will fit in buffer cache,
together with locks.
At another extreme, we have an application that creates a lot of
files but seldom opens them on the same node. In this case there is
no value in holding onto the locks, so we set demote_secs to a small
value and glock_purge as high as 70 to ensure locks are quickly
released in memory.
The best advice I can give in general is to experiment with
different settings for demote_secs and glock_purge while watching
the output of "gfs_tool counters" to see how they behave.
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
] On Behalf Of Fabiano F. Vitale
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 3:19 PM
To: linux clustering
Subject: Re: GFS2 poor performance
Hi,
for cluster purpose the two nodes are linked by a patch cord cat6
and the lan interfaces are gigabit.
All nodes have a Fibre Channel Emulex Corporation Zephyr-X
LightPulse and the Storage is a HP EVA8100
I read the document
http://www.redhat.com/promo/summit/2008/downloads/pdf/Thursday/Summit08presentation_GFSBestPractices_Final.pdf
which show some parameters to tune and one of them is demote_secs,
to adjust to 100sec
thanks
What sort of network and storage device are you using?
Also, why set demote_secs so low?
-----Original Message-----
From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
ffv@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 2:13 PM
To: linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: GFS2 poor performance
Hi all,
I´m getting a very poor performance using GFS2.
I have two qmail (mail) servers and one gfs2 filesystem shared by
them.
In this case, each directory in GFS2 filesystem may have upon to
10000
files (mails)
The problem is in performance of some operations like ls, du, rm, etc
for example,
# time du -sh /dados/teste
40M /dados/teste
real 7m14.919s
user 0m0.008s
sys 0m0.129s
this is unacceptable
Some attributes i already set using gfs2_tool:
gfs2_tool settune /dados demote_secs 100 gfs2_tool setflag jdata
/dados gfs2_tool setflag sync /dados gfs2_tool setflag directio /
dados
but the performance is still very bad
Anybody know how to tune the filesystem for a acceptable performance
working with directory with 10000 files?
thanks for any help
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
