> > The changes were made on 2.6.22 kernel. I would think RHEL 4.7 has the > same issue - but I'm not sure as I left Red Hat before 4.7 was released. > Better to open a service ticket to Red Hat if you need the fix. > > If applications are directly run on GFS nodes, instead of going thru NFS > servers, posix locks and flocks should work *fine* across different > nodes. The problem had existed in Linux NFS servers for years - no one > seemed to complain about it until clusters started to get deployed more > commonly. > > -- Wendy > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster That's always been tough for me to discern, as they stay with the same base kernel "name" while actually moving the code forward. 4.7 has kernel: 2.6.9-78.0.1.ELsmp . Now how that translates to the "actual" kernel number as 2.6.21, 22, etc, I never can figure out. -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
