Hi, If you have ability (in your storage system) to export that disk also via NFS, it's the simpliest way... you could restrict access just via mount/export perms and no gfs needed... works perfectly in ftp-usage. -hjp 2008/6/18 Richard Williams - IoDynamix <RichardW@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Please advise and/or redirect this posting if this is not the correct forum > for my question - thanks. > > A company wants to use clustered rhel5 systems as inside/outside ftp > servers. Users on the inside (LAN) cluster nodes can read and write to the > SAN, while users on the outside (DMZ) cluster can only read. > > Is this application possible without GFS? > > If one node in the cluster fails, can the other node be provisioned to > provide all services until recovery? > > Can a SAN be used as the "single" ftp location for both services (inside > FTP > & outside FTP?) > > Does the customer need more than four systems (i.e. 2 inside - 2 outside) - > is a separate "command" system required? > > > Have Dell's m1000e & 600 series blades been certified for this operating > system? > > Is there any documentation available regarding separate access rights for > multiple nodes in a cluster available? > > Thanks for your constructive reply. > > > > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster >
<<winmail.dat>>
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
