>-----Original Message----- >From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx >[mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ext Lon >Hohberger >Sent: 2008年10月24日 0:02 >To: linux clustering >Subject: Re: Two nodes cluster issue without >shared storageissue > >On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 17:10 +0800, Chen, Mockey (NSN - CN/Cheng Du) >wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I want to set up a two node cluster, I use active/standby >mode to run >> my service. I need even one node's hardware failure such as >power cut, >> another node still can handover from failure node and the >provide the >> service. >> >> In my environment, I have no shared storage, so I can not use quorum >> disk. Is there any other way to implement it? I searched and found >> 'tiebreaker IP' may feed my request, but I can not found any >hints on >> how to configure it ? > >Since you have no shared data, you may be able to run without fencing. > >That should be pretty straightforward, but you might need to >comment out the "fenced" startup from the cman init script. > >In this case, the worst that will happen is both nodes will >end up running the service at the same time in the event of a >network partition. > >The other down side is that if the cluster divides into two >partitions and later merges back into one partition, I don't >think certain things will work right; you will need to detect >this event and reboot one of the nodes. > >-- Lon I know such defects in two node cluster. Since our service is mission critical, I want to know how to avoid such failure case ? Thanks. -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
