Re: 4 node GFS cluster sanity check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 08:55 +0100, nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> RHEL 5.2 32bit kernel 2.6.18-92.1.10.el5PAE

> Here is the output of cman_tool status:
> Version: 6.1.0
> Config Version: 14
> Cluster Name: TEST
> Cluster Id: 1198
> Cluster Member: Yes
> Cluster Generation: 496
> Membership state: Cluster-Member
> Nodes: 7
> Expected votes: 6
> Total votes: 4
> Quorum: 4
> Active subsystems: 9
> Flags: Dirty
> Ports Bound: 0 11 177
> Node name: fintestapp4
> Node ID: 4
> Multicast addresses: 239.192.4.178
> Node addresses: 192.168.10.68
> 
> As you can see Expected votes is 6 while Total votes is 4 - whats wrong here ?
> 
> I would like confirmation that my cluster.conf is adequate please because after a few reboots last week expected votes and total votes give unexpected
> results.
> 
> If any more info is needed, please ask.

?

How can you have 7 nodes, expected 6 with a 4-node cluster
configuration.  It looks like you have two clusters with the same name
on the same subnet.

Also, you should chkconfig --del rgmanager if you're not doing failover.
You don't need it.

-- Lon

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux