> > 1) Tru64 and TruCluster with Advfs from 7 years ago is simply that much > > more robust and mature than RHES4 and CS/GFS and therefore tremendously > > outperforms it...or > > RHEL4 is quite old. It's been a while since I used it for clustering. > RHEL5 has yielded considerably better performance in my experience. Interesting. The only way I can see upgrading is: 1) using the upgrade options on the production node (scary, and downtime) or 2) do you know if RHEL5 will participate in a RHEL4 cluster? if so, I could add an RHEL5 node, make it master, and then have the ability to upgrade the other 2 one at a time. > > > 2) We have this badly configured. > > There isn't all that much to tune on RHEL4 cluster-wise, most of the > tweakability has been added more recently than I've last used it. I'd > say RHEL5 is certainly worth trying. The problem you are having may just > go away. Bummer! > > Gordan > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
