On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Chris Edwards <cedwards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I don't care either way, I was just responding to the last reply to my > message. The only reason I was thinking that you wouldn't want an fstab > entry is so that a server doesn't mount the GFS file systems until its apart > of the cluster. I had issues with this exact problem, so I edited /etc/init.d/gfs and changed chkconfig startup sequence order to a higher number (but still lower than all services that depend on gfs mounts). > > --- > > Chris Edwards > Smartech Corp. > Div. of AirNet Group > http://www.airnetgroup.com > http://www.smartechcorp.net > cedwards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > P: 423-664-7678 x114 > C: 423-593-6964 > F: 423-664-7680 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Brett Cave > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 1:53 PM > To: linux clustering > Subject: Re: GFS as a Resource > > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:36 PM, Chris Edwards > <cedwards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Without a entry in fstab my gfs file systems never mount. So I am >> wondering how I can leave out entries in my fstab. > > AFAIK, fstab is needed, unless u want to run gfs_mount with all the > params. Why would you specifically not want to have fstab entries? > > > Brett > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
