Re: gfs2, kvm setup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 04:33:15PM -0400, bfields wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 03:11:06PM -0400, bfields wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 02:35:29PM -0400, bfields wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:27:33AM -0500, David Teigland wrote:
> > > > This mount appears to have been successful.  Usual things to collect for
> > > > debugging the other problems:
> > > > - any errors in /var/log/messages from all nodes
> > > > - cman_tool nodes; cman_tool status from all nodes
> > > > - group_tool -v from all nodes
> > > 
> > > Thanks, I'll see what more information I can collect.
> > 
> > So, the first mount (on "piglet1") succeeds.  The second (on "piglet2")
> > returns immediately without mounting, and leaves this in the logs:
> > 
> > 	gfs_controld[3035]: segfault at 0 ip 08051361 sp bfd88ae0 error 4 in gfs_controld[8048000+1d000]
> 
> Looking at the object file, that appears to be in purge_plocks().
> 
> After rerunning configure with --debug and rebuilding, the second mount
> hangs instead of returning immediately without mounting.

By the way, as I've said, I'm using the STABLE2 branch with the one
patch from you to bring it uptodate with the latest kernel interface.  I
might actually prefer to try the master branch instead (with the stuff
labeled "cluster3" in the wiki), but didn't know whether it was actually
working at this point.  Is it?

My goal is just to be able to experiment with your latest posix locking
code and with nfsd exports.

--b.

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux