Yes that would be nice, my budget is very much smaller than that.
>From what i've read so far, the best looking solution appears to be
DRDB and NFS. With a structure similar to the following (v. bad) asci
diagram:
----------------- -----------------
| r/w node | | r/w node |
------------------ ------------------
^
NFS mount
v
---------------------- ---------------------
| DRDB node | <- linux HA -> | DRDB node |
---------------------- --------------------
Does GFS have any advantages over NFS, or am i being ignorant to the
prupose GFS?
James
2008/5/22 Denis Medvedev <a_mdl@xxxxxxx>:
>
> Hello,
> you can try www.cleversafe.org
> they provide iscsi fault-tolerant multi-node storage solution
> Denis Medvedev
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "James Bewley" <jamesbewley@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 10:25:38 +0100
> Subject: Fault tollerant filesystem
>
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm running a cluster and looking for a fault tolerant filesystem.
> >
> > currently have failover via linux-ha and need a shared drive between 4
> > machines idealy no one machine would need to be master and the removal of
> > any machine would not compromise data integrity.
> >
> > Can anyone suggest a good implementation that will fill my requirements?
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > James
> >
> >
> > --
> > Linux-cluster mailing list
> > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
> >
>
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
--
Aviation Briefing Ltd.
Registered in England and Wales
Company No: 3709975 Registered Office: Glen Yeo House, Station Road,
Congresbury, North Somerset BS49 5DY
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
