Oliveiros Cristina wrote:
/"First part of the procedure is to not use FC if you plan for this to
be useful"
/By this you mean that it is not a good idea to install it on FC? Is GFS
somewhat RH oriented?
FC is effectively RedHat alpha. There is no structural or organizational
difference between them. The differences are in stability and the amount
of testing that goes into things.
GFS (and RedHat Cluster Services which GFS is a part of) will run on any
distribution, of course - it's just that you may have to build the
correct stable packages from source, which seems pointless when you can
have something that just works already. It's down to personal preference.
I chose FC because I am not familiar with rh and I've read somewhere
that gfs would work on fc
It'll work, but running FC in a production environment is asking for
trouble. You might as well run it on Gentoo and custom compile
everything from bleeding edge sources, but it isn't going to help you
achieve a stable system that has been tested by someone else other than
just you.
Gordan
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
