2008/3/17, Lon Hohberger <lhh@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 14:50 +0100, Maurizio Rottin wrote: > > Hi, > > after some bonnie++ benckmarking it seems that the more nodes > > read or write, gfs2 is a lot better, but it seems to be very buggy. (i > > saved 10 minutes in running bonnie++ on 3 nodes with gfs2, respect to > > gfs) > > > > Anyway, my question is what's the best way to mount a gfs/gfs2 fs? > > > > I tried in this way: > > 1)i created gfs(2) > > 2)i created a failover domain for each node > > 3)i created a shared resource serving the gfs(2) > > 4)i created a service for each node for mounting that gfs(2) partition > > only on that node (associating it to its failover domain composed by > > only that node) > > > > Is that the right way, or are there better ways to do that, or is it > > completely wrong? > > > It's better to just use /etc/fstab and chkconfig --add the gfs/gfs2 init script... > > -- Lon > but in this way i don't get a monitor service which tells me if gfs is failed. Plus if i want the ftp server to stay up only if the gfs is up and fail if gfs goes down? -- mr -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
