OK, poorly thought out example. FYI, in heartbeat you can specify which interface to use for the service IP, though like rgmanager, you generally don't have to: http://www.linux-ha.org/HeartbeatResourceAgent/IPaddr2 http://www.linux-ha.org/v2/Examples/Simple Alex Kompel <barbos@xxxxxxxxx> 2008-03-12 10:39: > You will still need some way to tell the system through which > interface you want to route outgoing packets for each target. > You can achieve the same with greater ease by splitting the network in > 2 subnets and assigning each to a single interface. > It all depends on the problem you are trying to solve. If you want > redundancy - use active-passive bonding, you want throughput - use > active-active bonding (if your switch supports link aggregation), if > you want security and isolation - use separate subnets. > > -Alex > > 2008/3/12 Brian Kroth <bpkroth@xxxxxxxx>: > > This is a hypothetical, but what if you have two interfaces on the same > > network and want to force one service IP to one interface and the other > > to a different interface? I think what everyone is wondering is how > > much control one has over the service IP placement. > > > > Thanks, > > Brian > > > > Finnur Örn Guðmundsson - TM Software <fog@xxxx> 2008-03-12 14:36: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I see no reason why you could not have 3 diffrent interfaces, each connected to the networks you are trying to serve the NFS requests to/from. RG Manager will add the floating interfaces to the "correct" interface, that is, if your floating ip is 1.2.3.4 and you have a interface with the IP address 1.2.3.3 he will add the IP to that interface. > > > > > > > > > Bgrds, > > > Finnur > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of gordan@xxxxxxxxxx > > > Sent: 12. mars 2008 14:10 > > > To: linux clustering > > > Subject: Re: Two node NFS cluster serving multiple networks > > > > > > Sounds very similar to what I'm trying to achieve (see the other thread > > > about binding failover resources to interfaces). I've not seen a response > > > yet, so I'm most curious to see if you'll get any. > > > > > > Gordan > > > > > > On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Randy Brown wrote: > > > > > > > I am using a two node cluster with Centos 5 with up to date patches. We have > > > > three different networks to which I would like to serve nfs mounts from this > > > > cluster. Can this even be done? I have interfaces available for each > > > > network in each node? > > > > > > -- > > > Linux-cluster mailing list > > > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > > > > > > -- > > > Linux-cluster mailing list > > > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > > > > -- > > Linux-cluster mailing list > > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > > > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
