Re: Performance tuning help sought

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Kadlecsik Jozsef wrote:

> Digging into the mailing list archive brought out some GFS tuning options 
> too. What is already done:
> 
> - statfs_slots set to 128
> - statfs_fast set to 1	
> 
> What we are going to try is to set 
> 
> - glock_purge to 50
> - demote_secs to 150

The new settings did not really help, unfortunately.

I believe our performance problem might come from bouncing locks: there is 
no way to deliver incoming mail systematically to the same machine where 
the user is actually logged in or connected to via POP/IMAP. So when we 
see bad performance that may be the result of delivering to one machine 
and accessing the mailbox from another one.

Which knobs should we tune in order to achieve the fastest lock 
processing?

Also, currently we use maildirs. Were mailbox format better suited to GFS,
from locking point of view?

Best regards,
Jozsef
--
E-mail : kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxx, kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP key: http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt
Address: KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics
         H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux