(bump) But, adding noatime to the fstab did not work in my case. Is there another way for the noatime? Alexandre Racine 514-461-1300 poste 3304 alexandre.racine@xxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Alexandre Racine Sent: Tue 2008-01-29 11:37 To: linux clustering Subject: RE: noatime Hi, noatime will reduce traffic since if it's not there, each time you touch a file (read, write) it will change the value of the field "last access". But, just adding it to the fstab did not work in my case. Is there another way for the noatime? Has for your isplist, look here http://sourceware.org/cluster/faq.html#gfs_slowaftermount Alexandre Racine 514-461-1300 poste 3304 alexandre.racine@xxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx on behalf of isplist@xxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Tue 2008-01-29 11:09 To: linux clustering Subject: Re: noatime Were you trying this for a specific reason? I tried noatime to see if I could get a faster initial response time from the GFS volume. Every time I access it, there is a long delay initially, then things are fine until the next access. On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:26:19 -0500, Alexandre Racine wrote: > Hi all, > > If I put in my fstab file: > /dev/sdc5 /home gfs noatime > > > Will it actually mount without atime? And how can I confirm this? > > Thanks. > > > Alexandre Racine > 514-461-1300 poste 3304 > alexandre.racine@xxxxxxxxx -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
<<winmail.dat>>
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
