Re: DDRAID vs. GNBD+MD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 17:21 +0000, gordan@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Lon Hohberger wrote:
> 
> >> On a related node, was DDRAID ever stabilised
> >
> > In fact, it's been removed from CVS:
> >
> > http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/cluster/ddraid/Attic/?cvsroot=cluster
> 
> Ouch. I don't suppose that means that there is a reasonable alternative to 
> it? I know DRBD works for providing RAID1 without cantralized storage, but 
> is there anything supported and available that can provide any other kind 
> of RAID?

Not that I'm aware of.

I think your best bet at distributed storage is a distributed cluster
file system, a la GlusterFS, Petal/Frangipani (non-Free :( ), Lustre,
etc.

-- Lon

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux