Hi, On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 14:26 +0000, gordan@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > >> More generally, is there the list of hard points in GFS1 that you've > >> been trying to solve with GFS2, somewhere accessible on the web ? Also, > >> what is actually the maximum size that GFS2 is known to be working on ? > >> (both in terms of nodes and real size) > >> > > Really only whats in our bugzilla. Just search for all the bugs with > > GFS2 somewhere in the title. I don't know what the max size of any > > current GFS2 system is I'm afraid, > > Not sure if the information here is accurate, but: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems > "Depends on kernel version and arch. For 2.4 kernels the max is 2 TiB. For > 32-bit 2.6 kernels it is 16 TiB. For 64-bit 2.6 kernels it is 8 EiB." > It is accurate and if you look at the list of page editors you'll see that I updated it recently. > I am not sure if "64-bit" includes x86-64, because that isn't really > 64-bit despite what it's name might imply. > > Gordan > Thats true, but I don't think that was the question. I thought that he was asking about the current sizes that were actually being used rather than the max theoretical sizes, Steve. > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster