Re: would this configuration work for lvs-dr?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 18:06 -0500, Lon Hohberger wrote:

> Once that's done, you need to get the real servers to process requests
> for 192.168.1.100.

typo ... 2.100, not 1.100.


> Depending on how you do it, you will either place 192.168.1.100 as
> eth0:0 and do an arptables_jf setup, or you will not put 192.168.1.100
> on *any* of the real servers and instead use an iptables hack to use a
> transparent proxy to rewrite outbound packets to be sourced from
> 192.168.1.100.

Same here.

-- Lon

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux