On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 12:00:32PM -0500, Wendy Cheng wrote: > It is expected that GFS2 would do better in this area butt this does > *not* imply GFS(1) is not fixable. One thing would be helpful is sending > us the benchmark (or test program that can reasonably represent your > application IO patterns) you used to generate the performance data. Then > we'll see what can be done from there .... Take a typical public mirror tree (like Fedora, but FreeBSD gives you even more fun, as it has *huge* directories), start the rsync service and let a bunch of clients rsync some trees. -- -- Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> -- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364 -- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204 -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
