Re: I give up

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Scott Becker wrote:
jr wrote:
from my understanding a failover domain is required whenever you want
other nodes to take over a service. the subset is if you make it
restricted, isn't it?
regards,
johanne
From:
https://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-5-manual/en-US/RHEL510/Cluster_Administration/s1-config-failover-domain-conga-CA.html

"Failover domains are not required for operation."

    scottb

Not required doesn't mean not necessary for your particular situation.....

This tip/note was added with version 4.5.
I'm using 4.4 on almost all (two-node) clusters, except one that has version 4.5.
They all have failover domains and are working fine....


I think we should wait for some feedback from the developers, since they know the software a lot better and can explain this situation to greater extent...


Greets,
Marcos David

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux