Scott Becker wrote: > Yes, slow at best. This list is better. Support is not the issue. I'm > shooting for 100% uptime with simple failover. There are too many problems > with the software and I'm a month behind schedule. The biggest problem is > the core system is malfunctioning. Smaller problem is that in the same test > I ran into the fencing issue that others have experienced, the menus are > too dynamic for the current fence_apc agent. > > A month ago I thought, steep learning curve and then I'll be all set. > redhat.com gives the distinct impression that they are selling a completed > solution. I disagree. Have you tried RHEL 4.6 cluster? It's setup is really smooth oposite to RHEL 5.0, according to my experience. (As I said before, we will be trying 5.1 in few days). Jakub -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
