Re: Service Recovery Failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: linux clustering <linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Service Recovery Failure
From: Scott Becker <scottb@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 09:39:08 -0800
In-reply-to: <474C4B52.6080400@xxxxxxxx>
References: <474B4A5F.1080002@xxxxxxxx> <1196173738.12646.27.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <474C4B52.6080400@xxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)

I wonder if find_master_nodeid in recover.c had accurate information.

	scottb

fenced[9568]: 205.234.65.133 not a cluster member after 0 secpost_fail_delay


--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

References:
- Service Recovery Failure
  - From: Scott Becker
- Re: Service Recovery Failure
  - From: Lon Hohberger
- Re: Service Recovery Failure
  - From: Scott Becker

Prev by Date: Adding new file system caused problems
Next by Date: Re: Service Recovery Failure
Previous by thread: Re: Service Recovery Failure
Next by thread: Re: Service Recovery Failure
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Corosync Cluster Engine] [GFS] [Linux Virtualization] [Centos Virtualization] [Centos] [Linux RAID] [Fedora Users] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite Camping]

Powered by Linux