On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 14:19 +0000, James Fidell wrote: > So, I have my NFS cluster all set up, with NFS services and shared > storage all managed over a "private" network. > > My intention is to join several more nodes to the cluster using the > same storage, but providing services other than NFS. Is it possible > at the same time to provide services on a "public" network and have > floating public IP addresses which are also migrated across the > failover domain when the cluster fences a node? > > Is it just a case of creating a second IP address service in the > failover domain? Will the resource manager just "do the right thing" > and bind the floating address to the correct network interface? Yes, it binds IPs to NICs based on netmask + network. So... eth0 address/mask = 10.1.1.1/24 eth1 address/mask = 192.168.1.1/16 * All VIPs in the network 10.1.1.0/24 would get bound to eth0 * All VIPs in the network 192.168.0.0/16 would get bound to eth1 It doesn't matter what the cluster's using for its internal communications. -- Lon -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
