Oh I must have misunderstood the question.. Yes, the cluster matches up the virtual ip's to where they should be. I have three different subnets on three different interfaces and it works great. Examples: Vips: 10.0.13.5 10.0.14.5 10.0.15.5 On the servers are: Node 1 10.0.13.10, 10.0.14.10. 10.0.15.10 Node 2 10.0.13.11, 10.0.14.11. 10.0.15.11 Node 3 10.0.13.12, 10.0.14.12. 10.0.15.12 On 11/7/07 7:30 AM, "Steve Rigler" <srigler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 14:19 +0000, James Fidell wrote: >> So, I have my NFS cluster all set up, with NFS services and shared >> storage all managed over a "private" network. >> >> My intention is to join several more nodes to the cluster using the >> same storage, but providing services other than NFS. Is it possible >> at the same time to provide services on a "public" network and have >> floating public IP addresses which are also migrated across the >> failover domain when the cluster fences a node? >> >> Is it just a case of creating a second IP address service in the >> failover domain? Will the resource manager just "do the right thing" >> and bind the floating address to the correct network interface? >> >> James > > James, > > In the past we had multiple public interfaces and cluster service was > smart enough to bind multiple floating IP's to the correct interfaces. > > -Steve > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > -- Josh Gray Systems Administrator NIC Inc Email: jgray@xxxxxxxxxx Desk/Mobile: 913-221-1520 "It is not the mountain we conquer, but ourselves." - Sir Edmund Hillary -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
