Heh oh yea I understand all of that about EXT3.. It's in the cluster configuration, not mounting thru fstab. Josh On 10/29/07 11:47 AM, "Bryn M. Reeves" <breeves@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Are you sure about that? I've never known it do anything useful beyond >>> spectacularly breaking the file systems involved. >> >> I can't see why it would. If the fs is mounted ro, no harm will come to >> it. Any writing, though, and you're likely to trash it faster than you >> can type mount -o ro,remount. :-) > > The "are you sure about that?" was at the idea that you could have the > fs mounted writably and not run into problems unless you tried to write > to the same files (or their metadata) on the two hosts simultaneously. > Your original message seemed to imply that this would work. > > Regards, > Bryn. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFHJgB46YSQoMYUY94RAvNPAJ9wpEn96/WWanaKAECAehr2DcLmbACeOdEM > 6bmhkBRPLvWbK5Vz97AnSs0= > =73As > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > -- Josh Gray Systems Administrator NIC Inc Email: jgray@xxxxxxxxxx Desk/Mobile: 913-221-1520 "It is not the mountain we conquer, but ourselves." - Sir Edmund Hillary -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
