Re: watchdog with GFS?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Maciej Bogucki wrote:
> Alexandre Racine napisał(a):
>> Hi all, 
>>
>> I would need to have some good and bad points to use watchdog (the software Linux app) has a fencing device for GFS.
>>
>> Does some of you have some experience with it? Let's just say that I want to use DRAC's witch are very nice, but some people needs to be over-convince sometimes.
>>
>> Shoot everything your got :)

Using watchdogs / manual fencing is such a bad idea it even gets its own
FAQ entry:

http://sources.redhat.com/cluster/faq.html#fence_manual

As a backup method or for testing/development/debugging it has some
uses, but as your primary fencing method in a production environment it
is just not suitable.

Regards,
Bryn.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHHcu16YSQoMYUY94RAhAbAJ9zOP3r52bUDXCGteXE8ghsr85svQCgzoT9
x1vQX4vyYHiRzym+SJEOXEs=
=puXN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux