On 10/19/07, David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Is there a date set for the release?
M
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 08:05:02PM +0200, tam_annie@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> So, without qdisk my cluster just behaves exactly as I ever wanted! So
> is qdisk evil? However, please, be so kind to explain this strange
> behavor to me, that's really a _MYSTERY_: Isn't the qdisk a tie-breaker
> useful especially in two node clusters and if one needs to decide
> cluster membership also on the basis of exogenous heuristics (like
> network connectivity as in my case, see RedHat Cluster FAQ)? Shouldn't
> the qdisk allow one to build a more robust cluster against split-brain
> conditions? Why does my cluster behave good only if I avoid using
> qdisk? Have I really no more chance to use a quorum disk in my cluster
> architecture? If it can help, I'd like to tell you that when I start my
> cluster with qdisk enabled, both nodes wait for each other on "Starting
> fencing..." before going on in the boot sequence: no node can boot alone
> while the other one is down. That doesn't happen when I don't use
> qdisk, as you told me. Again, thank you very very much indeed!
qdisk doesn't work well in RHEL5.0; I'm told it will work in 5.1
Dave
Is there a date set for the release?
M
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
