Re: Linux clustering (one-node), GFS, iSCSI, clvmd (lock problem)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Paul Risenhoover wrote:

> Ouch. Good to know. If I use raw devices can I grow and shrink > volumes? The specific need is to be able to take a physical devices out > of service (ie, one of my iSCSI devices) so that I can restripe it or > replace it.

 But you can also run lock_nolock on top of LVM partition, *any* LVM
 partition, cluster or not... Why going thru so much troubles for a local
 filesystem ?

I'm planning on adding nodes as necessary.  I'm future-proofing!

You would be better off using a decently architected SAN solution to cover that aspect. You'd get better performance, lower RAID disk overheads, and better scalability.

Gordan

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux