Re: partition tables not sync'd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Silly question: you also masked that lun on the active node, right?
You could also remove the /etc/lvm/.cache and lvmdiskscan / vgscan --mknodes

On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 09:08 -0700, Ray Charles wrote:
Hi,

I have a one year old cluster(2 nodes) in production
that is GFS 6.1 attached to an iscsi san. Its
currently in an active passive arrangement for
tomcat/apache.

While the active node was busy servicing web visitors,
I used the other node to add a lun from the san; then
a physical volume and then a logical volume to the
existing vol.group; then I put the file system on the
new partition. I also have it mounted on the
non-active node.

The active node will not recognize the new partition
schema. I've rebooted it but it still doesn't want to
see the new partition the other node has created.

What should I do?


-tia





      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Don't let your dream ride pass you by. Make it a reality with Yahoo! Autos.
http://autos.yahoo.com/index.html
 


--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux