Thanks for your comments.
Really, I was thinking about this hypothesis too but, I need to improve the performance overall. Of course, HA is a implied concept on that kind of Cluster.
GFS or HA-iSCSI, only will help me to consolidate the Database files but wont give the growth in scale, that is what I'm looking for.
Our database partner is insisting to make us to use the IBM's HACMP but, I'm not sure about this yet.
What do you thing ?
Emerson
2007/9/26, Jordi Prats <
jprats@xxxxxxxx>:
Hi,
I'm not a expert on DB2 but I don't think RHcluster will give you a
performance-oriented cluster of DB2 databases. Instead, I could provide
you a HA database or a HA-iSCSI target or GFS for your datafiles.
Remember that if you share the same datafiles DB2 should be cluster-aware.
By the way, Oracle RAC it's a cluster by itself, it does not use RH
cluster in any way.
Hope this helps.
regards,
Jordi
Emerson Henrique da silva wrote:
> Hello all!
>
>
> Does anybody ever used Red Hat cluster for DB2 Databases ? (performance
> clusters)
> Is it similar to Oracle's RAC, that have a particular cluster manager ?
> In my readings, I fell that RH Cluster is not the right way to achieve
> the targets that I've finding. In the IBM's site, the documents are very
> confused to locate it.
>
>
> Thanks for comments.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
