--- PaweÅ? Mastalerz <pawel.mastalerz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Roger Peña pisze:
> > --- Alexandre Racine <Alexandre.Racine@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all, I would like to know that too, since I
> made
> >> some similar tests and GFS seems simply to hang.
> >>
> > people getting this king of problem usually have
> a
> > problem with fencing, your fencing is manual, this
> is
> > really bad for production because if there is a
> > problem with the GFS in one node,the cluster will
> wait
> > for that node to be feced and if it fenced by
> humand
> > hand.....
> > until you send the aknowledge that the cluster
> will be
> > in standby.
>
> Yes, but i use:
>
> <fencedevice name="blade" agent="fence_bladecenter"
> ipaddr=....
>
sorry, I didn't read throught your messages, just
looked at Alexandre Racine's configuration
> and it's not a problem, fence work fine. Fence work
> only when one of
> nodes is down or have some other problem with
> connection to other nodes.
well, I would expect if one node has a problem with
its GFS filesystem ( for example, network failure in
the iscsi scenario), the cluster should-must fence
that node just to avoid filesystem corruption
but I could be wrong...
cu
roger
__________________________________________
RedHat Certified ( RHCE )
Cisco Certified ( CCNA & CCDA )
____________________________________________________________________________________
Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell.
http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
