RE: Please correct me if I'm wrong, but...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 
No, it does not require administrator interaction--in the service you would add a resource for the file system. This would move the file system between nodes.
 
=====
 
________________________________

From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Randy Brown
Sent: Mon 8/20/2007 16:39
To: linux clustering
Subject: Re:  Please correct me if I'm wrong, but...


Right.  That's the way I understood it to be.  Using ext3 would require us to have to umount and remount the file systems to the each host after the failure, though, correct?  In other words, would require administrator interaction.  GFS would do this automatically without impacting the users.

Randy

Lon Hohberger wrote: 

	On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 03:26:08PM -0400, Randy Brown wrote:
	  

		in order to configure a two-node high availability NFS failover cluster, 
		I need to use GFS, correct?
		    

	You can use EXT3; you just can only mount the file system on one
	node at a time. 
	
	With GFS, you can export the same file system from *both* cluster nodes.
	
	-- Lon
	
	  

<<winmail.dat>>

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux