On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 04:09:58PM +0300, Janne Peltonen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 11:48:19AM -0400, Lon Hohberger wrote: > > That's quite an impressive cluster.conf... I'm going to look at it > > some. > > One thing that makes it longer than strictly necessary is the fact that > each service has its own prioritized failover domain. I could, of > course, just have one failover domain for each possible permutation of > nodes pcn1-hb..pcn4-hb... on the other hand, I feel safer to edit the > failover domain specification on a live system than to edit the service > specification (to change the failover domain) - I don't know whether > rgmanager would want to restart a service if I changed its failover > domain (would it?), but I know it doesn't restart a service if I edit > the failover domain specification... It will restart the service currently; there's an open bz against rhel4 to fix it (not strictly failover domains - but generally any attr. of the service except its name should not cause a restart; it's fixed in 5.1). -- Lon Hohberger - Software Engineer - Red Hat, Inc. -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster