Entered a bug.
Bugzilla Bug 250811: clustat report wrong information about rgmanager on a GULM cluster
Hope it will be solved soon, which can save some work of mine, since I can not trust/rely on clustat right now.Thanks,
Siman
On 8/2/07,
Lon Hohberger <lhh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 10:22:33AM -0400, siman hew wrote:
> I found clustat report wrong information about rgmanager when a cluster is
> GULM.
> I setup a 3-node cluster on RHEL4U5, with GULM. There are one failover
> domain, one resource and one service, just for testing.
> I found clustat always report rgmanger is running after cluster is started.
> With the configuration with DLM, clustat report correctly.
> node4 is lock server, and all nodes report the same inaccurate information.
GULM doesn't have a way to provide sub-groups really, except for users
of lockspaces.
Can you file a bugzilla about this? I wonder if we can get the
information for "what nodes are in this lockspace" from GULM. If it's
possible, we could probably fix it.
--
Lon Hohberger - Software Engineer - Red Hat, Inc.
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
