hi Lon, l have LVS/DR on my network. I don't use the piranha for LVS/DR. But I propose piranha for using LVS/NAT. Additionally, if I want to do network tunning, why do I use the piranha ???
for this, I use my knowledge on linux.. have a nice day.. Mehmet CELIK Istanbul/TURKEY
From: Lon Hohberger <lhh@xxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: linux clustering <linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx> To: linux clustering <linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: doubts in Piranha Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:36:22 -0400 On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 05:02:43PM +0200, Tomas Hoger wrote: > On 7/11/07, Lon Hohberger <lhh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >(You can do it in RHCS4 too; I don't know about RHCS3) > > It's also possible to use LVS-DR on RHEL/RHCS3. > > Regarding documentation: It only mentions arptables as ARP problem > fix. For kernel 2.6+, there is also another way using sysctl, which > does not require additional kernel patches / modules. There is an IPtables one in the docs too, which works on both 2.4.x and 2.6.x IIRC. -- Lon Hohberger - Software Engineer - Red Hat, Inc. -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
_________________________________________________________________ http://newlivehotmail.com -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
