On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 06:45:37PM +0300, Janne Peltonen wrote: > > So. > > Is it really necessary that all the members in a cluster have access to > all the resources that any of the members have, even if the services in > the cluster are partitioned to run in only a part of the cluster? No. > Or is > there a way to tell the cluster that it shouldn't care about the fifth > members opinion about certain services; that is, it doesn't need to > check if the services are running on it, because they never do. (1) don't start rgmanager on the fifth node :), or (2) if you do start rgmanager on the fifth node, make all services be part of a "restricted" failover domain comprised of the other four nodes. > Or > should I just make sure that the fifth member always comes up last (that > is, won't be running while the others are coming up)? Or should I aceept > that I'm going to create more harm than avoiding by letting the fifth > node belong to the cluster, and just run it outside the cluster? If the above two don't work, it's a bug. (Oh! and those status-script checks will be fixed in 5.1 ;) ). -- Lon Hohberger - Software Engineer - Red Hat, Inc. -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
