On Jun 24, 2007, at 11:48 PM, Jordi Prats wrote:
I supose you say so because the disk could be slow, but it should
not be this slow because they virtual machines and they are
accesing the same way as is the local disk. (Both are LVM volumes)
I found almost no documentation about how to install GFS2, so I'm
assuming I did something wrong. I supose GFS2 do not add about 5
minutes of delay because of it's operations!
I think you're right. GFS2 is *supposed* to be faster than the
original GFS, and here's what I get.
ey00-s00001 data # pwd
/data
ey00-s00001 data # time du -hs postgresql-8.2.4/
76M postgresql-8.2.4/
real 0m0.061s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.050s
ey00-s00001 data # df -Th
Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 reiserfs 2.0G 783M 1.3G 39% /
udev tmpfs 512M 120K 512M 1% /dev
shm tmpfs 512M 0 512M 0% /dev/shm
/dev/sdb1 gfs 227G 128G 99G 57% /data
--
-- Tom Mornini, CTO
-- Engine Yard, Ruby on Rails Hosting
-- Support, Scalability, Reliability
-- (866) 518-YARD (9273)
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
