Performance on GFS, OCFS2 or GFS2?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "linux clustering" <linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Performance on GFS, OCFS2 or GFS2?
From: "Kristoffer Lippert" <kristoffer.lippert@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:29:02 +0200
In-reply-to: <F154BEC9D4278D4BA9B94BDEC76193482BA6D3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4678E2CE.4050302@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <F154BEC9D4278D4BA9B94BDEC76193482BA6D3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AcezE5dMfEVozvnUTYCQpNjcXqpxAwAIT+HgAASKKZA=
Thread-topic: Performance on GFS, OCFS2 or GFS2?

Hi,

I'm considering different options for a SAN. Are there anyone who knows
of a comparison of the GFS,  GFS2 and OCFS2 filesystems?
Mostly i'm concerned about performance and stability (maturity).

It'll be running on a RHEL 5. 

Kind regards
Kristoffer


--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Performance on GFS, OCFS2 or GFS2?
  - From: Rainer Duffner

References:
- problem starting clvmd on second node.
  - From: Dan Deshayes
- RE: problem starting clvmd on second node.
  - From: Robert Gil

Prev by Date: Re: problem starting clvmd on second node.
Next by Date: Re: problem starting clvmd on second node.
Previous by thread: Re: problem starting clvmd on second node.
Next by thread: Re: Performance on GFS, OCFS2 or GFS2?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Corosync Cluster Engine] [GFS] [Linux Virtualization] [Centos Virtualization] [Centos] [Linux RAID] [Fedora Users] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite Camping]

Powered by Linux