If after a conference call with Red Hat tech support today goes well, I will close all open tickets and write U4 off as an aberration.
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 14:07 +0200, Cosimo Streppone wrote:
rhurst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Odd, I got just the opposite from them, instructing us to do the upgrade > to fix our rgmanager / dlm bugs... the channel HAS the correct packages > for U5 as of this past Friday, and they 'up2date' perfectly. No new > issues to report, except our 11-node cluster is running on U5 now with > all its features: GFS, pulse, rgmanager, etc. RH Tech support has discouraged me to upgrade a two-nodes cluster for two reasons: 1) RHCS 4U5 packages were not released to rhn. 2) RHEL 4U5 kernel (2.6.9-55, correct me if I'm wrong) has an issue and therefore they suggest to wait for a following fix. I think that 1) is no more the case. RHCS channel is, in fact, updated to the current kernel (2.6.9-55). For 2), I don't know. My test machines run smoothly with 4U5, but for production machines, I'm holding the upgrade. Now I'm running 4U4 (2.6.9-42.0.10) and related cluster packages. And you?
|
Robert Hurst, Sr. Caché Administrator Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center 1135 Tremont Street, REN-7 Boston, Massachusetts 02120-2140 617-754-8754 ∙ Fax: 617-754-8730 ∙ Cell: 401-787-3154 Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. |
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
