Hi, Then it should have the basic bind mount stuff, but I don't think it has the more advanced shared subtree features. Also note that the "ro" flag will be silently ignored for bind mounts, as they take their cue from the original mount. Some other flags, e.g. nosuid, do work as you'd expect though, Steve. On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 11:17 -0400, berthiaume_wayne@xxxxxxx wrote: > This is RHEL 4.4. > > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steven Whitehouse > Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 11:06 AM > To: linux clustering > Subject: Re: GFS and Simultaneous Access > > Hi, > > On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 07:36 -0700, Tom Mornini wrote: > > On Apr 17, 2007, at 7:27 AM, berthiaume_wayne@xxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > Also, I've been trying to figure out a way to allow all my nodes > > > access to the same filesystem/LUN with separate directories for > > > each one > > > within the same filesystem for simultaneous access. Is this > > > possible or > > > would this be the place to use the SCSI reservations? This is being > > > > done > > > strictly for testing. > > > > Take a look at Context Sensitive Symlinks. > > > > If you: > > > > ln -s @host common_directory > > > > Then when each host accesses common_directory it will resolve to that > > system's hostname instead. > > > > A better plan, if possible, is to use bind mounts which are available on > all filesystems and more powerful than the context sensitive symlinks. > It depends on which kernel version you are using as to whether this is > available to you and how comprehensive the features are, > > Steve. > > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
