Re: Active/Passive - GFS needed?

[Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>]

not really.  You could use cluster suite (rgmanager) for failover and use ext3.

 brassow

On Apr 5, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Brad Filipek wrote:

I will have a two node cluster connecting to a fibre channel SAN (AX150). There is only one application on the server that our users will access by using telnet or SSH with a terminal emulator. If I setup this two node cluster up as active/passive, is there a need for GFS?

 

 

Brad Filipek
Network Administrator
Continental Refrigerated Services, LLC.
P- (708) 587-3640
F- (708) 534-4699
bfilipek@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.crscold.com

 

 

Confidentiality Notice: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by email reply or by telephone and immediately delete this message and any attachments.

--

Linux-cluster mailing list

Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx

https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster