Re: Asymmetric config for two-node cluster with qdisk?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 06:50:34PM +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Should I put some asymmetry in the cluster config (and/or the qdisk
> heuristic scripts) of a two-node cluster to make (only) one node
> decide to continue its services in case of a split-brain problem?
> 
> Or are heartbeat failures ignored *if* the quorum disk still shows
> that the other node is running ok (or does this only affect whether
> to fence or not)?
> 
> During my tests (disconnecting nodes, shared storage via working)
> I got tons of messages like
> 
>   qdiskd[4012]: <crit> A master exists, but it's not me?!
>   qdiskd[4012]: <crit> Critical Error: More than one master found!

That's fixed in CVS.

-- Lon

-- 
Lon Hohberger - Software Engineer - Red Hat, Inc.

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux