> Does it make sense to use GFS (local or cluster mode) on > Compact Flash? Will it greatly reduce the life expectancy of > the Compact Flash compared to using a local file system? The > rational behind this is that GFS will issue way more writes > to the disk for its internal operations ( such as dlm locking etc). > Ummm, why would you want to use CF & GFS together??? Surely you'd only use GFS for a shared pool of storage. As the largest CF card you can sensibly get atm is around 8GB, that's not a lot of storage to be shared by multiple nodes. Now we use CF cards for embedded boxes, but for exactly the reasons you mentioned (poor MTBF/reduced lifetime due to the read/write process), our cards are invariably read-only filesystems and we use ext2 to get rid of the journaling too. No swap either (which has caused some trouble on one or two occasions, but that's another story). Dan -- Dan Hawker Linux System Administrator Astrium http://www.astrium.eads.net -- This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
