We have a situation that we may need to use GFS2 to share storage in our system in the future and to ease the pain of transition at that time (convert files into GFS), we're thinking of using GFS2 just as a local file system for now. How is GFS2 compared to other popular local file systems such as ext3 and Reiser in terms of performance, overhead etc? Are we hitting the wrong direction totally by using GFS2 just as a local file system? BTW, we've run bonnie on local GFS2, and the performance is decent compared to ext3 (90%). Lin -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
