On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 10:54:59AM -0800, Roger PeXa Escobio wrote: > but that bug is private? > I am getting: > " You are not authorized to access bug #215793" > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215793 > > this is my second bug hit that is marked privated, > sadly related to cluster stuff > this is just a new trend in the working flow in redhat > or it is just because the reporter marked as privated > and redhat engineer respect the client's privacy ? Sorry about that, private bugs are stupid, I don't understand it myself. There's no reason the bug couldn't be visible with any private customer details hidden. There's probably some mysterious buraeucratic way of dealing with it but I can't be bothered. I've opened a new bz instead: 227892: assertion 'x <= length' failed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227892 AFAICT, there's nothing interesting or helpful in the private bug, it just records the difficulty various people have had trying to reproduce it. Thanks very much for the reports of this, it may be a break in finally solving this. Dave -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
