Ivan Pantovic wrote:
It seems that latest STABLE CVS won't compile.
it is probably sneaked in regarding Bugzilla 216209 code change but
now we have an undeclared 'iocb'
Yeah, very likely - I never added Asynchronous IO (AIO) code into
branches other than RHELs. And the fix of 216209 was built on top of
AIO. Sorry about that. I'll remove it when I get to office first thing
tomorrow morning (it is about midnight here now).
For now, you can safely remove the following if statement without
affecting code correctness.
/* for asynchronous IO, the buffer can not be splitted */
if (iocb) {
count = do_write_direct_alloc(file, buf, size,
offset, iocb);
goto out_iocb_write;
}
-- Wendy
/var/tmp/portage/gfs-kernel-1.03.00-r1/work/cluster-1.03.00/gfs-kernel/src/gfs/ops_file.c:
In function `do_write_direct':
/var/tmp/portage/gfs-kernel-1.03.00-r1/work/cluster-1.03.00/gfs-kernel/src/gfs/ops_file.c:652:
error: `iocb' undeclared (first use in this function)
/var/tmp/portage/gfs-kernel-1.03.00-r1/work/cluster-1.03.00/gfs-kernel/src/gfs/ops_file.c:652:
error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
/var/tmp/portage/gfs-kernel-1.03.00-r1/work/cluster-1.03.00/gfs-kernel/src/gfs/ops_file.c:652:
error: for each function it appears in.)
/var/tmp/portage/gfs-kernel-1.03.00-r1/work/cluster-1.03.00/gfs-kernel/src/gfs/ops_file.c:653:
error: too many arguments to function `do_write_direct_alloc'
make[2]: ***
[/var/tmp/portage/gfs-kernel-1.03.00-r1/work/cluster-1.03.00/gfs-kernel/src/gfs/ops_file.o]
Error 1
make[1]: ***
[_module_/var/tmp/portage/gfs-kernel-1.03.00-r1/work/cluster-1.03.00/gfs-kernel/src/gfs]
Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.18-gentoo-r5'
make: *** [all] Error 2
Best regards.
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
